An order from NGT against your commercial project can freeze it within minutes. These orders can levy unsustainable amounts as environmental compensation or close your running industrial unit. No matter whether you are a project proponent or MSME/Corporate running businesses in India if you have received a sudden environmental order to cease your operations the reaction time for both operational and legal crisis management kicks in. Time provided under law to appeal against NGT orders is very strict and admits no extension/procrastination errors
So what happens when you suddenly lose your environmental clearance or are asked to pay up compensation as per polluter pays principle. The NGT Act establishes NGT as a quasi-judicial environmental Savita over matters entrusted to it with extensive powers. Orders from NGT have the same effect as a decree passed by a civil court. Therefore, if NGT orders have a direct effect on you and your business, or the place where you live, you can file an appeal against such order.
Appealing against NGT orders is not something you take lightly. The law and the procedure to follow are highly technical and have a limited period to file such appeals. However, many people become ineligible to file an appeal because they file it beyond the limitation period or before the wrong forum. Here we provide you a step-by-step procedure to follow while appealing against NGT orders.
There has been an increased scrutiny from NGT Regional benches-New Delhi,Bhopal,Chennai,Pune,Kolkata through suo motu directions and individual public interest litigations filed every now and then asking industries across sectors to ensure and double check their compliances. Construction related activities, residential project-endeavours and Industrial setups established in compliance with approvals are under watch-list in Delhi NCR, Gurugram, Noida and Faridabad, Bengaluru, Mumbai Pune and many more such upcoming areas. Multi-crore businesses can come to a grinding halt because of one public interest litigation filed or one suo motu notice issued by tribunal.
Cost of non-working is aside, the amount that Courts may levy as daily fine for non-compliance and possibility of criminal proceedings for violation of environmental laws are too high for any boards and developers to ignore the adverse order of NGT. There are instances where embarrassment in front of shareholders and Investors alone is enough damage for Municipal bodies, RWAs and builders if they do not file an appeal against NGT order.
An appeal before the National Green Tribunal Against Environmental Tribunal Order is essentially a statutory appeal preferred by a person who is aggrieved by a judgment/order. It can be filed to set aside/quash/reverse/modify the order passed by the Tribunal. This appeal however is not heard in the regular manner as a civil appeal.
There is no re-hearing of witnesses and reconsideration of primary evidence. The scope of the appeal is limited to examining whether the Tribunal had acted beyond its powers or had erred in applying environmental law principles or principles of natural justice.
Many entrepreneurs have tried to approach a State High Court trying to file a writ petition against the final order of the Tribunal. Remember that the statute has not envisioned any role for High Courts in respect of final orders passed by NGT. High Courts are skipped and appeals go directly to the Apex Court. Save those lost days from your limitation time.
The appeal process against environmental orders is dealt with under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 (“NGT Act”). Section 22 specifically provides that “Any person aggrieved by an award, decision or order of the Tribunal may prefer an appeal to the Supreme Court only and not elsewhere against the award, decision or order…………”. Further, such appeal shall lie only on such grounds as are otherwise available for appealing to the Supreme Court under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”).
The limitation for filing such an appeal is of 90 Days before the date, which may be condoned by a maximum of 60 days if there is sufficient cause for the delay.
The principles which would be relied upon for deciding the case would be those of sustainable development, precautionary principle and polluter pays principle as provided under Section 20 of the NGT Act. So in order to appeal an order, your lawyer would have to establish that the Tribunal has either not followed the principles mentioned above or based its decision on improper technical opinion.
Typically, the time begins to run from the date when the order is officially served upon your attorneys. Accordingly, the certified copy of the judgment should be applied for and collected from the tribunal registry at the earliest. Such judgment copy is then gone through threadbare to spot errors of procedure, mathematical mistakes in computing penalty or absence of scientific basis to the findings.
It would be an error if arguments concerning facts tried below were repeated. Instead, your lawyers need to frame wherein lies error of law – perhaps interpretation of an Environmental Notification went wrong, or opportunity of hearing was denied to you. Note that framing of such substantial questions of law requires sound knowledge of statute as well as nuanced appreciation of ever developing environmental jurisprudence.
Appeal memorandum is prepared along with an application praying for ad-interim stay of operation of the tribunal order. Application for stay is required to establish that your business would face immediate devastation and irretrievable loss if the impugned order were to continue operating. It would be an ideal time to retain Advocate BK Singh to frame effective arguments balancing out the convenience.
Appeal along with stay application is filed through ERP system which is subsequently subject to defect verification by the registry officials. Upon getting all defects rectified, your appeal shall be placed for admission before a divisional bench of the tribunal. Here, you lawyers would have to persuade the bench that the appeal deserves to be heard.
| S.No. | Critical Procedural & Material Errors |
|---|---|
| 1. | Trying to file your petition in the wrong forum like arguing a case at a state High Court through writ petition instead. You will waste many months before your case gets rejected. |
| 2. | Appealing the case as if it were a trial. Taking up fundamental issues like arguing facts, cross-examining witnesses etc. Remember that in an appeal you ONLY get to argue a substantial question of law. |
| 3. | Missing the statutory limitation period. Believing that the general law for extending the civil limitation period of suits will apply freely to your case like because there is a holiday. |
| 4. | Not being prepared when the appellate court issues a Pre-Deposit condition. Getting surprised when the appellate court orders you to deposit a percentage of penalty before staying in closure/eviction. |
| 5. | Relying on old environmental rules. Thinking that notices issued by the Ministry regarding environmental laws, circulars & notifications will remain the same. They are constantly changing. |
| 6. | Providing non-authenticated documents relating to the technical operation of the industry. Submitting meager operational data when the court expects authenticated ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT REPORTS & POLLUTION CONTROL RECORDS. |
| 7. | Not complying with tribunal directions on an interim basis. Simply not following the orders issued by the tribunal during trial. This will seriously harm the petitioner when he seeks relief from the same tribunal in the appeal. |
| 8. | Booking your lawyers only a couple of weeks before the 90 days limitation is about to expire. |
Settling an adverse environment order without challenging it forthwith can have disastrous consequences for your business. As it stands now, SPCBs have the power to disconnect electricity & water supply to your industrial unit. Additionally, the enforcement officials have powers to initiate prosecution u/s 26 of NGT Act and jail you or levy personal fines.
From a business perspective, pending order of closure or environmental compensation of several crores which is not challenged stays disclosed in your financial statements. This affects your credit ratings, results in loan defaults with banks and financial institutions, stalls all pending business deals. Taking swift legal action is not only your right but your business obligation.
You need to appoint an appeals lawyer at the stage when a single bench of the High Court directs you to show cause as to why you should not pay heavy cost OR when the court reserves the order. Do not wait for the order to land on your table before consulting a lawyer for opinion. It is too late by then and you lose valuable time to prepare your defense. For example, your lawyer will get time to file technical rejoinder evidence and approach the court for urgent stay before your case is taken up by the enforcement officers.
Many a time even if you have hired corporate lawyers they may not be equipped to deal with matters which require heavy technical understanding like large project constructions, CZpet regulations matters, individual forest clearances etc. In such cases you need someone who has hands-on experience with environmental cases related to Industries. Advocate BK Singh can help you steer clear of pitfalls by building a robust case on strong legal grounds.
When significant environmental issues are at stake, you need acute business acumen combined with seasoned litigation skills. https://www.legal365.co.in/ will guide you through the process, from analyzing the structure of the risk to appearing for you at the apex courts of India. We can help you translate technical science into compelling arguments on appeal.
Advocate BK Singh has years of experience helping industrial facilities, property developers, and infrastructure companies appeal unreasonable orders from tribunals. At Legal365, we make sure your appeal briefs are error-free, deadlines are met, and your operations can continue.
Ans. No. It is highly unusual for writ petitions to lie against final orders of the tribunal before High Courts because Section 22 provides a special & exclusive right of appeal to the Supreme Court. High Courts invariably send you back to the Supreme Court after wasting precious limitation days.
Ans. It means a dispute pertaining to interpretation of Environmental Laws/Dispute between judgments/orders or gross miscarriage of natural justice by Tribunal.
Ans. Section 22 is not subject to automatic pre-deposit condition but appellate court often asks the appellant to deposit at least 1/3rd of the penalty before entertaining a plea for interim stay.
Ans. You can approach the appellate tribunal within 150 days from the date of order by filing a formal application for reasons for delay (popularly known as condonation of delay application). However, if more than 150 days have passed since the order was passed, the appellate tribunal has no statutory jurisdiction to allow the delay.
Ans. Yes, you can file for an ad-interim relief while an application for appeal is being heard. If your advocate establishes that the Tribunal order is legally unsustainable, not backed by science and shutting down the industry would mean financial catastrophe to you, you can get an instant stay.
Ans. Any person aggrieved by the order can file an appeal before the High Court or the Supreme Court as the case may be. Therefore, whether it is a project developer, an industrial house, State Pollution Control Board, Municipal Corporation or any common man affected by the order of the Tribunal, all have a right to appeal.
Ans. No. When you file an appeal, the order of NGT will continue to operate unless you make a specific application for stay and convince the bench that the order should be stayed till disposal of appeal.
Ans. Yes. If any environmental NGO or citizen who was a party to the original proceedings before NGT thinks that NGT went wrong in granting relief to the industry and has violated the provisions of Environmental Laws protecting Environmental Safety, then you can file an appeal.
Ans. The Supreme Court checked if NGT appointed experts to see if the penalty was arrived at scientifically or if the Tribunal arbitrarily imposed the penalty on the offender. If the Tribunal slapped the penalty on you without any scientific data to back its order, then the Appellate Court can overturn the penalty or minimize it to a great extent.
Ans. Advocate BK Singh handles your matter from identifying errors in NGT order to drafting statutory appeal and representing you before Supreme Court or High Courts for Appeals against NGT Orders.
Speak directly with Advocate BK Singh at LEGAL365.
Book Appointment Call NowFree first consultation. Honest legal advice.